Забранено им е по конституция да водят военни действие. Освен това от 70 години не са милитаристична държава а "нация техническа"RRSunknown wrote:Забранено дръжки
Великобритания са на 28 място ако това ти носи информация, имат 827 самолета.
Реалистични милитъри анимета? Има ли?
I believe there's another world waiting for us Sixsmith. A better world. And I'll be waiting for you there
-
RRSunknown
- Elder God
- Posts: 9514
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:54 am
[original is in Japanese]
Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.
In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.
-----
"renounce war and the threat or use of force". According to this clause, Japan haven't hold a military (but not banned). However, since self-defense is necessary for any country, Japan hold Self-Defense Forces.
But they can't launch a preemptive strike against other nations according to the constitution.
That is why Japan can't and didn't dispatch military and troops when the US troops was in battle in the Mid-East.
Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.
In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.
-----
"renounce war and the threat or use of force". According to this clause, Japan haven't hold a military (but not banned). However, since self-defense is necessary for any country, Japan hold Self-Defense Forces.
But they can't launch a preemptive strike against other nations according to the constitution.
That is why Japan can't and didn't dispatch military and troops when the US troops was in battle in the Mid-East.
I believe there's another world waiting for us Sixsmith. A better world. And I'll be waiting for you there
Сори, че ви развалям лаф-мохабета тука, искам само да препоръчам на РРС-а да види Legend of the Galactic Heroes. Сай-фай в космоса е, ама е бая избарано и се върти около войната на една демократична многопланетна република и една автократична многопланетна империя. Акцентът не е само върху битките - има и бая заигравки с политика и т.н., ама където има битки, са се постарали да са стратегически и тактически избарани. И главните герои всичките са разни офицери. Досега това е единственото аниме, което бих класифицирала като реалистично милитъри такова, нищо, че е в сай-фай сетинг. Мен лично ме докарва до душевен оргазъм и сега го гледам за втори път в рамките на 2 месеца с Александър, който също го захапа много мощно.
-
RRSunknown
- Elder God
- Posts: 9514
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:54 am
Тук ще е добре да опишете, кои реалистични моменти от LOGH ви кефят...защото цвета на бронята на космическите кораби някак не ми звучи...пък пишете и ако него го смятате за реалистичен и непластвасов...
Военните порядки?
На мен във филма ми се сториха малко (абе направи много) театрални.
Стратегията?
В смисъл, ако може малко по-подробно само на военна тема.
(Иии това...не се заяждам...просто не съм в такова настроените ...любопитно ми е...)
ПП
За мен реализмът е плюс, но не винаги има пряка връзка с това дали ще ме изкефи едно заглавие или не.
Ето TTGL е доста нереалистично, но ме радва...а Gunbuster 1-2 на същите хора, може и да има по-реалистични sci-fi елементи (релативизъм и пр.) и по-смел полет на фантазията, но някак ме дразни малко с историята си и отношенията между героите...затова и кефометърът ми дава по-ниска оценка.
Военните порядки?
На мен във филма ми се сториха малко (абе направи много) театрални.
Стратегията?
В смисъл, ако може малко по-подробно само на военна тема.
(Иии това...не се заяждам...просто не съм в такова настроените
...любопитно ми е...)Ако не се лъжа той Драгуна тогава не го беше гледал, а разчиташе на нечии чужди похвали по темата...just saying...Драгуна (кой много добре знае какво ме кефи)
ПП
За мен реализмът е плюс, но не винаги има пряка връзка с това дали ще ме изкефи едно заглавие или не.
Ето TTGL е доста нереалистично, но ме радва...а Gunbuster 1-2 на същите хора, може и да има по-реалистични sci-fi елементи (релативизъм и пр.) и по-смел полет на фантазията, но някак ме дразни малко с историята си и отношенията между героите...затова и кефометърът ми дава по-ниска оценка.
The coffee had been steadily growing more and more execrable for the space of three weeks, till at last it had ceased to be coffee altogether and had assumed the nature of mere discolored water — so this person said. He said it was so weak that it was transparent an inch in depth around the edge of the cup. As he approached the table one morning he saw the transparent edge — by means of his extraordinary vision long before he got to his seat. He went back and complained in a high-handed way to Capt. Duncan. He said the coffee was disgraceful. The Captain showed his. It seemed tolerably good. The incipient mutineer was more outraged than ever, then, at what he denounced as the partiality shown the captain’s table over the other tables in the ship. He flourished back and got his cup and set it down triumphantly, and said:
“Just try that mixture once, Captain Duncan.”
He smelt it — tasted it — smiled benignantly — then said:
“It is inferior — for coffee — but it is pretty fair tea.”
“Just try that mixture once, Captain Duncan.”
He smelt it — tasted it — smiled benignantly — then said:
“It is inferior — for coffee — but it is pretty fair tea.”
-
RRSunknown
- Elder God
- Posts: 9514
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:54 am
Та за реализма...ако може едно кратко списъче...просто ми е любопитно...няма да коментирам, просто ми трябва за лична употреба .
.The coffee had been steadily growing more and more execrable for the space of three weeks, till at last it had ceased to be coffee altogether and had assumed the nature of mere discolored water — so this person said. He said it was so weak that it was transparent an inch in depth around the edge of the cup. As he approached the table one morning he saw the transparent edge — by means of his extraordinary vision long before he got to his seat. He went back and complained in a high-handed way to Capt. Duncan. He said the coffee was disgraceful. The Captain showed his. It seemed tolerably good. The incipient mutineer was more outraged than ever, then, at what he denounced as the partiality shown the captain’s table over the other tables in the ship. He flourished back and got his cup and set it down triumphantly, and said:
“Just try that mixture once, Captain Duncan.”
He smelt it — tasted it — smiled benignantly — then said:
“It is inferior — for coffee — but it is pretty fair tea.”
“Just try that mixture once, Captain Duncan.”
He smelt it — tasted it — smiled benignantly — then said:
“It is inferior — for coffee — but it is pretty fair tea.”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest